AlphabetPhoto: O is for old

gravestone

“1632*. Here lies the body of …..”

On the opposite side of the lane to Batcombe church, we were surprised to spot an old gravestone in the wall. We stood for a moment and pondered whether it really indicated the location of a body.

gravestone in wall

Given the context and it’s state, the verdict was that it was a good recycling project. Name has long since gone. No-one left to know for sure.  I think it works well as part of a wall. Out of place. Adding interest that only such an oddity can do.

Joining in with Charly’s #AlphabetPhoto linky. I could have gone with “out of place” or “oddity”, but this week my  O is for old. After all, a gravestone from 1632 is certainly old.

*Not sure if the date is 1632 or 1637, but the gravestone seems to date back to some time in the 1630s.

28 comments

  1. Wow thats incredible, I’ve become fascinated by old things now that I live in a country where anything 50 years old is considered ancient! I love the idea of it being a recycling project 🙂 #alphabetphoto

    1. Almost 400 years old, would seem ancient in comparison to 50 years. 😀 A nice reminder of how much tangible history we have around us.

  2. How interesting, what a great find. I love little oddities like that, really gets you wondering how they got there x #alphabetphoto

    1. It does, doesn’t it? Maybe it did mark a spot, but I doubt it. Wondering if I’d choose to add it to a wall of mine. Questions. Questions.

    1. It is a great idea. Stones have always been taken from crumbling old buildings to build more houses. Just more recycling.

    1. Difficult to tell through all the lichen and moss. Not helped by the erosion. I’ll look more closely when I next visit.

Comments are closed.